Disagreements over who should come and on what terms which could not be
resolved in time has hindered talks aimed at ending the five-year civil war
that has claimed more than 250,000 lives and displaced 12m people scheduled for
January 25th in Geneva.
At some point, it looked as if the talks could at last get under way on
January 29th. But as the veteran diplomat ruefully conceded on Monday, threats
to pull out should be expected: “Don’t be surprised: there will be a lot of
posturing, a lot of walkouts and walk-ins, you should neither be depressed nor
impressed. The important thing is to keep momentum.” As reported by The Economist.
Predecessors to Mr de Mistura gave up after peace conferences they had
convened got nowhere as even that current limited goal may prove dauntingly
hard to achieve. Hopes of some progress this time were raised after a meeting
of the 17-country International Syria Support Group (ISSG) in Vienna in
November, which was followed by a UN Security Council resolution calling for
talks to start in January that would lead to a “credible” transitional
government in place by July this year. Fair elections based on a new
constitution would be held by the middle of 2017. Besides the start of the
talks, it will be a miracle if any of those other milestones are met. Mr de Mistura admits that the participants
are united only by mutual loathing. At the beginning of what he sees as a
six-month process the groups will be kept in separate rooms, while he shuttles
between them in a search for something they can agree on.
Failure to agree on which groups should be invited as representatives of
the Syrian opposition caused for the postponement of the talks. Gamely, Mr de
Mistura sent out formal invitations to his diplomatic dance on January 26th.
Hotel bookings have been made and a few TV camera crews have turned up in
Geneva, but confusion reigns.
Under the auspices of Saudi Arabia, a High Negotiations Committee (HNC)
has been established to represent the many rebel factions at the talks. But
although it excludes both Islamic State and Jabhat Al-Nusra, al-Qaeda’s Syrian
affiliate, it includes hard-line Salafist outfits, such as Jaish al-Islam and
Ahrar al-Sham, which collaborate with Jabhat Al-Nusra and which explicitly rule
out the principles of democratic pluralism outlined in the ISSG’s Vienna
communiqué. The military commander of Jaish al-Islam, Zahran Alloush, was
killed by an air strike on December 25th, but the group’s political leader,
Muhammad Alloush, has been chosen as the HNC’s chief negotiator in Geneva.
The Syrian government tends to regard any opposition figure who has ever
carried an AK47 as a “terrorist”, but it is supported by its allies Iran and
Russia in wanting Ahrar and Jaish kept out of the talks. However, Russia is
demanding the inclusion of other individuals and groups, such as the Kurdish
Democratic Union Party, whose YPG militias are fighting both the regime and
Islamic State to carve out an autonomous region in the north-east of the
country along the Turkish border. Turkey says it will pull out if the Kurds are
at the table because they are allied with a Turkish terrorist group, the
Kurdistan Workers’ Party. Bowing to pressure, Mr de Mistura did not invite the
Kurds.
A further problem is that parts of the Sunni Arab coalition say they
will not attend unless there is a halt to air strikes by the regime and the
Russians and the lifting of sieges in rebel-held territory where civilians are
starving. They point out that these are confidence-building measures required
by the UN resolution. But although Mr de Mistura bemoans the squabbles over
participation as a distraction from more important issues, he is pleading for
people to turn up in Geneva without preconditions.
No comments:
Post a Comment